I'm amazed

"OPPOsaurus WRX" (opposaurus) 10/26/2018 at 21:38 • Filed to: None

3

11

Som one found a way to reduce the visibility in a Camaro

KingT- 60% of the time, it works every time > OPPOsaurus WRX 10/26/2018 at 21:49

2

But the Louvres make the car faster, aerodynamics and shit bro!

ttyymmnn > OPPOsaurus WRX 10/26/2018 at 21:58

4

You pretty much need a periscope as it is. 

OPPOsaurus WRX > KingT- 60% of the time, it works every time 10/26/2018 at 22:15

0

You shoulda seen the weird aero shit on  the front

Urambo Tauro > OPPOsaurus WRX 10/26/2018 at 23:45

0

Gonna need a couple (more?) backup cameras.

AdverseMartyr > OPPOsaurus WRX 10/27/2018 at 00:07

2

And made it ugly. 

boxrocket > AdverseMartyr 10/27/2018 at 11:31

2

-er. Uglier. 

AdverseMartyr > boxrocket 10/28/2018 at 09:28

0

Shhh... I didn’t want to go there. I don’t want to jinx it and end up with the 80/90s versions again.

boxrocket > AdverseMartyr 10/29/2018 at 07:20

0

Those weren’t SO bad. Sure they didn’t have the “classic” look, but they had the appearance of being fast, like the Coevette’s lesser sibling. Someone just got carried away with the “ catfish” face, but every US automaker (and some non-US) had at least one car with that look, so it didn’t stand out as uniquely awkward more than the others. 

AdverseMartyr > boxrocket 10/29/2018 at 10:25

0

I think you should read your defense, and then remember that adding louvres  didn’t make the cars look worse (the 80s camaros might actually have looked better with them.).

boxrocket > AdverseMartyr 10/30/2018 at 02:56

0

I’m confused. Louvres for ‘80s cars were period-correct and functional. Louvres for a modern camaro looks tacky and silly, and grossly overwrought, and reduces the already-shitty visibility.

AdverseMartyr > boxrocket 10/30/2018 at 09:02

0

Louvres were all those things in the 80s as well. Only somehow they didn’t make the Camaro  uglier. There were cars in the 80s that louvres did make ugly (or uglier in some cases.